Here's the publisher's description:
In the twenty-first century, the romance genre has gained a growing academic response, including the creation of the International Association for the Study of Popular Romance. Popular romance has long been so ignored and maligned that seemingly every scholarly work on it opens with a lengthy defense of the genre and its value for academic study. Even the early scholarly works on the genre approach it in ways that, while primarily respectful, make sweeping generalizations about popular romance, its texts, and its readers.
This essay collection examines the position of the romance genre in the twenty-first century, and the ways in which romance responds to and influences the culture and community in which it exists. Essays are divided into six sections, which cover the genre’s relationship with masculinity, the importance of consent, historical romance, representation, social status and web-based romance fiction.
I have not given separate entries to essays which deal with romantic fiction/fiction with romantic elements, but which wouldn't fit the current definition of romance. These essays are:
"'Say, could that lass be I?' Outlander, Transmedial Time-Travel, and Women's Historical Fantasy," by Ashley Elizabeth Christensen (79-96)
"'I'm a mehfil, I'm a gathering to which everyone is invited': Reading 'Outcast' Romances in Arundhati Roy's Fiction" by Lucky Issar (187-198)
"The System that Loves Me: The State of Human Existence in Web-Based Romantic Fiction from Post-Socialist China" by Jin Feng (201-215)
I've added tags for them to this main entry, though.